Book Review on The Making of Global International Relations: Origins and Evolution of IR at its Centenary

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19359848

Keywords:

Global IR, Non-Western IR, World History Approach

Abstract

The quest for Global IR brings important transformations to the International Relations (IR) discipline. It calls for the inclusion of non-Western approaches into the discipline. Acharya and Buzan are pioneers of this transformation. They began their research with non-Western IR and turned it into Global IR, which aims to prevent the parochialism of both Western and non-Western IR, but rather mutual construction. Their book The Making of Global International Relations: Origins and Evolution of IR at its Centenary is a crucial step in achieving this aim. It successfully demonstrates the intertwined relations between international political developments and IR through its world history approach. However, the book has its constraints as well. It prioritizes the core/the West in its structural formation and focuses exclusively on the English language rather than incorporating local scholars. More importantly, the book overlooks the non-Western contributions that fail to find a place in core Western IR. It requires such approaches to de-provincialize themselves and extend beyond their regions to be recognized as valuable theories. This shifts the gatekeeper role from the Western IR to Global IR, which can decide whether an approach is valuable based on its representation in Western IR and its ability to have global applicability. This paper provides a critical review of the book while highlighting its significant contributions to Global IR.

References

Acharya, A. (2014). Global international relations (IR) and regional worlds: A new agenda for international studies. International Studies Quarterly, 58(4), 647–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12171

Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2007). Why is there no non-Western international relations theory? An introduction. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7(3), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcm012

Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (Eds.). (2010). Non-Western international relations theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia. Routledge.

Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2017). Why is there no non-western international relations theory? Ten years on. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 17(3), 341–370. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcx006

Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2019). The making of global international relations: Origins and evolution of IR at its centenary (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108647670

Anderl, F., & Witt, A. (2020). Problematising the global in global IR. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 49(1), 32–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829820971708

Aydinli, E., & Aydinli, J. (2024). Exposing linguistic imperialism: Why global IR has to be multilingual. Review of International Studies, 50(6), 943–964. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210523000700

Buzan, B., & Little, R. (2010). World history and the development of non-Western international relations theory. In A. Acharya & B. Buzan (Eds.), Non-Western international relations theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia (pp. 197–220). Routledge.

Buzan, B., & Schouenborg, L. (2018). Global international society: A new framework for analysis. Cambridge University Press.

Wallerstein, I. (1997). Eurocentrism and its Avatars: The Dilemmas of Social Science. Sociological Bulletin, 46(1), 21–39.

Yıldız, T. (2022). Book review “amitav acharya and barry buzan, the making of global international relations: Origins and evolution of IR at its centenary, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2019.” Uluslararasi Iliskiler, 19(74), 101–103.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-01

How to Cite

Yılmaz, Ömer. (2026). Book Review on The Making of Global International Relations: Origins and Evolution of IR at its Centenary. Journal of Social Perspective Studies, 3(1), 62–67. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19359848